Skip to main content

LOST DEITIES OF PAGANS: (Con't)


LOST DEITIES OF PAGANS: (Con't)

By: Nicolaas Gillingham; Ordained High Priest Kemetist (Egyptian Worshiper), Pagan Author and Poet




The Eclectic Neopagan (#2) "Chinese restaurant" approach (Pme from Pantheon A, one from Pantheon B) must always be incapable of authenticity because it will never constitute actual Polytheism. Too often it fuctions in general as serial Monotheism: Brigid today, Ganesha next Tuesday, Ra next time we feel like. Once we have learned to think Polytheistically, as the old Pagans did, we will come to understand that genuine Paganism must of necessity inhere in relationships.

To say "Pantheon" implies lateral interaction within the pantheon itself, not merely between the worshipper and whichever god she/he designs to "summon" today. The eclecitic surrounded by his/her gods who don't speak with one another together constitute a rimless wheel which is the hub and spokes only, unable to move or withstand pressure: a wheel is incomplete as to be no wheel at all. And in the last, Eclecticism offers the insights and correctives of comparativism, but can take us no further.

This brings me to Reconstructionism (3). I personally would contend that all attempts to resurrect the historic pantheons, any of them, are ultimately doomed to inconsequence. The old pantheons are dead languages, which we can study but no long speak. Even if through diligent study we do learn to speak with them fluently, they will never be anything more than idiosyncratic curios, lacking mof modern vocabulary and forever incomprehensible to our comtemporaries. Necessarily ungrounded in our own real world experience, they will always be a second language, never an mother tongue.
While the ethnic Paganisms have important things to teach us concerning the necessity of cultural authenticity, at their worst they become purist ghettoes of nostalgia-driven re-enactors. We must never forget our received tradition or fail to learn from it; without it, we have no solid basis by which to evaluate our own experiences. But ultimately the ways of the ancestors cannot teach us what we most need to know: How to be honestly Pagan for our own time and place.This can only be understood from our own encounters with the very sources that inspired these ethnic traditions in the first place. We must drink from the original wellspring itself.

A thousand years ago the Younger Gods fell in valiant battle, and a world fell with them. In a very real sense, it was the end of tens of thousands of years of human history. (refer to the rise of Christianity)

Who are these failed Gods, why did they fail, and why are they not the Gods of our "Post Ragnarok Era: requires? The Younger Gods are the imaginal powers, nothing more and nothing less than the products of the human imagination, their existence verifiable by subjective means only. Most modern verisons of the Gods of the historic pantheons belong to this category. These gods neither pre-existed humanity, nor will they continue after us; they have no power apart from what we give them. But because they are the makings of our own minds, we love them for their human faces.

Our tendency to divinize our own ideas is rooted in the nature of language. Because Love, Justice, and War are nouncs, we tend to think of them as solids, as tangible things or beings which occupy real space. But of course in reality they have no active existence outside of the sphere of human thought and action. We must always be wary of deifying ideas, a collective hubris of the most destructive sort.

Abstractions, fictional characters, and personifications of functions simply won't and can't by definition, be Gods. The products of our own minds can never have the power to save us from ourselves because they are, at the last, nothing more than the human brain chattering to itself. Until we make the courageous, radical leap out of our own internal dialogue and into actual relationships with real, non-human others, we will ultimately continue as we are now; imprisoned inside out own heads.

In the end, the Younger Gods failed because they departed from what must always be the touchstone for the best and truest human spirituality: the interaction of the human mind with the natural world. Gods cannot be said to have real, ontological existence except insofar as they correlate with the natural world.

Within our modern era humanity must reutrn to the primal source, the great archaic powers that truely exist and always have: what we may call the Elder Gods. These first beings existed long beofe homo became sapiens, and they will continue long after we are gone. They are Gods ontologically real, their existence objectively verifiable.

For conceptive reasons that shoulbe be abundantly obivious to you the read, these Gods make their appearance in culture after culture. (While the Younger Gods, by their very nature, vary widely from pantheon to pantheon, the Elder Gods are generally more or less the same.) Pleniscient, plenipresent, and plenipotent, they constitute our oldest known pantheonl they are also the most modern, no belief required. Though long eclipsed by younger, more human Gods, in their enduring power, presence, and majesty they have never ceased to speak to us. Neither allegories nor symbols, they are real beings, with whom we, at every moment of our lives, cannot help but engage. They are as near eternity as we may hope to touch, ontologically permanent, oldest and most young.

It is due to them, that I literally exist to write this and for you the reader to read it: without which, not. This is Polytheism of the "hardest" sort. They are Themselves, none identifiable with one other; to say, after all, that Earth is Sun is Moon is a nonsense. Their interactions are real relationships, both with one another and with us.

Polytheism has never been a matter of mere plurality, but rather of pantheon, of gods in community. To rearticulate these relationships in the language of myth is to begin the process of humaity's return to spiritual intimacy with the non human world.
Some Pagans will wish to distinguish, for example, Earth the Goddess from Earth the Planet. It is my view, this is a distinction without a difference. I would borrow the term from Hindu theology, they are "non different." Goddess Earth is co extensive with Planet Earth.
We are, and cannot help but be, citizens of our own century. We know irrevocably about physics, evolution, and depth psychology. Try as we might (and afew I know have tried mightily), we can never return to a pre scientific worldview premised on "belief". In what sense, after all, may one be said to "believe" in Earth or Sun? Belief, so prominent in the Montheisms, recedes into deserved irrelevance when we embrace instead what Anthony Scott has sited as "a glorious sacred materialism.

Also, the resurgence of the Elder Gods breaks down the way of separation between religion and science that has partitioned Western thought since the Enlightenment. The rise of science has taught us things about Earth, Sun, and STorm that the ancients would have marveled to know. We are in the enviable, irresistible position of being able to learn, through science, about the very Gods themselves.

The Elder Gods have always been the special province of the Pagan. Pace Wicca, witchery is not and has never been a religion per se; it is, rather, a magical technology. That being said, no magical technolog exists independent of a cultrual matrix, and the first and truest matrices of the Craft are the old polytheist world views of ancient Europe. When others turned their faces towards Younger Gods, the Witch continued to treat with the untamed elder powers in the making of her magic. This is one reason why even in antiquity people held the witch and her powers in fear and suspicion. This being so, how then did the Horned One and Lady of the Moon come to be regarded as the modern witch's only Gods?

It is as if, high in the Greek mountains, a village of goat herding magic workers had continued in the old ways long after the advent of the new religion (Christianity). In time, due to pressures both intenral and external, all the other Gods, Younger and Elder alike --Zeus, Athena, even Dionysos-- have come to be forgotten. The sole survivors of this leveraged divine attrition as one might expect are the preeminent Gods of herding and magic, Pan and Hekate.
This is contemporary and modern Craft as we find it. The Lord and Lady are the witch gods par excellence because in ages of ages it was they who first learned the magic arts and taught them to their children, and so to this day we their children honor them first among all other gods. And they're a wonderful couple, really they are. but now it's time to meet the rest of the family.

With the return of the Elder Gods, exciting new panoramas of possiblity open before us. Wicca's bitheism has stifled the emergence of new mythology precisely because its divine population was too small to create compelling narrative. But once we come to undersand that the Horned One is not the Sun, is not Thunder, is not the Green God, the new myths begin spontaneously to tell themselves.

If the horns and green are not different faces of the same God, who then are they and what are they to one another? To pose the question is to begin to answer it: They are twin sons of Earth, born at one birth, lovers and rivals. The new mythologies are waiting, poised on the threshold of articulation.
When we redefine "God" in such a way as to encompass this old new understanding of the world, the burning question becomes, not "Do the Gods exist?" But rather "Do they know that we are here?" Are the Elder Gods sentient, self aware beings who, for instance, act with conscious intent and hear us when we speak to them?

The ancestors would certainly seem, for the most part, to have thought so. If, indeed, they are sentient, we should realistically expect to find among them a sentience very different from our own. At the very least we may say that, whether the old Gods are sentient or not, they are real, their gifts to us are real, and their relationships with us are real.

We know for certain that self awareness does exist in the world of nature; it is we outselves. In humanity the universe achieves the ability to perceive and reflect upon itself, and to reflect upon that process of reflection. This is what makes us the "wise". This is the proper work of the Witch; to be the eyes through which the world understands itself. Let us not expect the Gods to do our work for us; they are busy enough with their own work.
If the Sun and Storm do not hear us when we praise them, or receieve the offerings that we make, why then offer or praise at all? Our relationships with them are real enough; so long as we acknowledge this, what does it matter whether we ritualize those relationships or not?

It is my contendation that we do so out of a sense of identity, of solidarity with our past and future. This is what our pwople do and have alsway done. We concerse with the Gods through symbols. Myth and ritual are the language by which the mind articulates t itself realities that cannot be direcly expressed in other ways; prayer and offering are metaphors that express very real relationships. It is the spiritual technology of the ancestors; how else shall we do it?
In modern days we as Pagans continue to make offerings because at the heart of Pagan social ethic stands the principle of Do ut des (a gift for a gift). Since everything that we have has been given to us, it behooves us to give in return. Only human infants heedlessly take without giving back. Our social world view revolves around this principle given to us by the Elder Gods, ultimately everything that we have and love comes from them as does life itself. For this, the best of gifts, do we not owe them, at the least with our thanks, respect and praise, regardless of whether they hear us or not? Or do we, like an spoiled child, continue to take and take without the least obligation of gratitude and recognition?

In this old/new world of the many, we should expect that the Gods will show us multiple faces; as we know, they have always been shape shifters. Pan is wont to wear the form --or at least the horns-- of whichever animal figures largest in the local economy. In forest country he tends to be antlered. On the Great Plains of North America he often sports, as one might expect, bison horns. Among cattle herders, he is bull horned; in the Mediterranean hills, his horns are often a goat's or ram's. In Australia where there are no native horned animals, he typically shows himself as the Kangaroo Man.
Another example; the Sun shoulb be seen differenly by different people in different places should not surprise any one. All the Sun Gods of humanity point to the same underlying reality; for us all, there is only one Sun. Call him what you will. That you in your valley know him/her by a different name when I only adds to the interest. One story is never enough.

We must become once again the people of the many, our goal nothing less than the replytheization of the West. In polytheist society, it is understood that we benefit by cultivating our relationship with the Gods, just as any intimate relationship requires ongoing maintenance. Since there are ttoo many Gods for anyone to properly befriend them all, it only stands to benefit us when others honor different Gods than we do; in that way, all the Gods receive their due, and everyone comes out ahead.

Above everything, new Pagans must learn to honor the many as they manifest in our own time and place. While the ways of the ancestors -- the Received Tradition -- must always inform our thought and action, we are truest to our ancestors and heritage when we think and act as natives of here and now. Our mandate is to be the Pagans of our own time, our own place, our own post-modern, science driven Western culture. It is the only kind of Pagans we can honestly be; anything else is pretense.

The Elder Gods were the Gods of my ancestors and yours. Within our own day, it is for us individually to enter once again into the tright relationship with them. As John Michael Greer said, We live in a world full of Gods. The Earth upon whom we live and die, the Sun rising in its splendor, worthy of worship, as the Moon is at night. The Winds that grant us breath, the Fire that burns at the heart of history. Him of the Horns who has haunted humanity's dreams from the very beginning: these are our lost-found pantheon, our once and future Gods.

So somewhere a God with a voice of thunder, speaking the primal word, is even now moving in beauty and terror towards us. My friends, let us arise and go and meet him.


Article By: Nicolaas Gillingham; Ordained High Priest Kemetist (Egyptian Worshiper), Pagan Author and Poet



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

YULE

 

October- Samhain: The Thinning of the Veil Between Worlds ...

IT'S HERE: THE DRAGON BOOK OF ESSEX

ADDENDUM: MID-JUNE, 2014 We are also now on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Edge-of-the-Circle-Books-Events/106285532728383 Become a Fan; post your event on the discussion page! EDGE OF THE CIRCLE BOOKS IS PROUD TO PRESENT THE FOLLOWING COLLECTIBLE TITLE FROM XOANAN PUBLISHING: THE DRAGON-BOOK OF ESSEX By Andrew D. Chumbley Published, June 2014 Quarto format, 832 pp., single volume. Containing numerous illustrations and sigillae by the author throughout. Standard Edition: Limited to 808 hand-numbered copies, full bookcloth over heavy boards, with gilt blocking on cover and spine. List Price $292.95 FROM THE PUBLISHER: O’ Milcham-i-Azh’rail! Lift Thou Thy blade to Heaven, seven times tongued with flame, there to cut open the heart of the Sun, that its lifeblood may flow into Thy mouth; thus to empower Thee as the Messenger Divine– the catalyst for the translation of the Seeker’s Mind into the Circle of the Seven Stars . This